livelog 31,141 entries · root c89d7ee3d54b · read 15:42:37
the record/entry 30123
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCD3Q2WP7BSO2OXDXADD54H7OSVUAHGUABEWI3M5BIGKPH6HKTX3SCYW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.017ms2026-08-31 20:47:33
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCD3Q2WP7BSO2OXDXADD54H7OSVUAHGUABEWI3M5BIGKPH6HKTX3SCYW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
490a70656873ef49e4035ad1a55eb24e9eedb4d15c2284d203d3a118cb344e9b
request
3f29eba305c8cd32ed5b08f7bac5947bcf4c135c69bc562ace2040933a96a7a7
transaction
7e436675b3db0152f93e4bf8ee8d13c06857dc890c8e9808adb5140b7e8d3430
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30123
recomputing…
the chainentry 30123
sealed to the entry before
d2392771dad05aba82a7edaf9081ca1a994d605bee9ff0113e50a5eca654aeac
this leaf
1a76fdc417a51b86667c3a30335d29ab6537faf4fc3e86c75e011f2bab8fcda6
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
pJugJNtu/qCtv5qJN17giNrMtwKv8orLxHp4zHA3o7fgFUZzXdGlKu+AfQosYEo9zzgEGRekI5NwHEQUy/o2Bg==