livelog 31,301 entries · root bf58412b1b20 · read 18:47:51
the record/entry 30359
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GAYCMIMRX36BF3LVG64OVBOPMWLWEWC244MDLDJTKXVCBSQJJKJFQOUI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.300ms2026-09-01 01:22:33
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GAYCMIMRX36BF3LVG64OVBOPMWLWEWC244MDLDJTKXVCBSQJJKJFQOUI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
eb56bb25d8c971bd07ba2d5b0454371c6df9ed006b29ff4427567b4fa3dacba0
request
da0fa6cea008a3a12c026e311184daa22b0dcb19a0e696a25201e95508268fc5
transaction
0935d27c3444c97d97005e37c214b5907ae57037d4a3dd454871a02c5a220f47
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30359
recomputing…
the chainentry 30359
sealed to the entry before
ba6d89e2982a3248430c18ca33d0c63ec470849590b2d1886719f8a61b84d695
this leaf
1b7210a3b8cca574f84ff652aa0030b60e01eaa4f86fc82770037889d7391d98
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
38OXEEdcAqJH83SbjCRM7kfWtheCn6+xQr8VU+en+vPTGfG50BPihQFZ5nJTcCqe/u8mHaj6iJjzuHIaos93BQ==