livelog 31,410 entries · root 417a668ea133 · read 20:42:44
the record/entry 30624
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCWP72YRZ5HEYQGZNLM3CLKSOO6AHSD6GY4FUJVKRTWTKZG4U4OPR5AI to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.261ms2026-09-01 06:17:36
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCWP72YRZ5HEYQGZNLM3CLKSOO6AHSD6GY4FUJVKRTWTKZG4U4OPR5AI to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
a6343a829f98725fcc4673621156b49a1df1cb58add14bb34fa8d673fbaf2550
request
7da282a26f896e8ddc7549ea60335810a3bc8b35bbf282588287a0636ac960e1
transaction
c1207ec930ece850913f422ae1bdb637427f9463b53a4a29a8eab9f4c071f368
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30624
recomputing…
the chainentry 30624
sealed to the entry before
cfe17714c710f1f49e90d3fa3c8503b79e842f23f64046fa3e4bd04021b45833
this leaf
1b84c0028400267d9a0f26b67ea267f9d7840ebd07eb07ac021d054171c95d28
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
DFwdVaoFjfzMVTIUG/X19tzxxklwYFjg8l/v9wRAeAxJ+1pB2ahKLeOB4D6uYieGnMEDGV6BP14ANsdVupp8AA==