why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBPHGIAM7TENDR7X443KP5OZSS7E7IJ3Z2QXXHJIP7WYHU63HLC7HAF2, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBPHGIAM7TENDR7X443KP5OZSS7E7IJ3Z2QXXHJIP7WYHU63HLC7HAF2 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d0b68d6b1f6b1041d3aebdc8f39776e5e9d32c577844ae00e5b3f535940a38a0
- request
- 5d0f4bd800581abe0829bb493d9e1ec0251434e13981be9c1a4ece9aa5f3ac48
- transaction
- ab86fa7567e41524e2b8f15d785f56210673f3c0c1467b3b7f5f4c4063a116ffcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 38050
the chainentry 38050
- sealed to the entry before
- 15bd0b821c2baa195de05846a4d8ea440d87e33d907bce2e13a348ca00e9ec53
- this leaf
- 1bacd7aa1bec392741320c3a6ff87e6b90aaf2e5c55cf185c42f8909a3a6c791
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 8DVYMsK66l0u6NNIK53IliQFsV2UDVDRuqZnkFXZunor4wwdgPUa8zsvlAAXmKW1Tv9PvCtONOtf9BBfkddcBw==