why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCXTZ6I4HYE4N4P2ZPJKW4KGIOXK3I5ZK34UWWFKANETTIUMGNME3UCI, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCXTZ6I4HYE4N4P2ZPJKW4KGIOXK3I5ZK34UWWFKANETTIUMGNME3UCI is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 23f1da066f2a65906f7c6be0745e2cf8aebfeaf4f5cb1b1839df11d755c72468
- request
- d555576b88157deb1aac4eb5fb8ad5490aea93114ed62d8b55729c106514b1c4
- transaction
- 01fcfa42d92a48cba80c8b728e9c6ec525c2fc45e7b4adce4cb0b5205d00e877computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 63045
the chainentry 63045
- sealed to the entry before
- 6ea168851cce518983de88c0e220311ce36d98604c173193f98b4069f5658073
- this leaf
- 1bd9b274a62e325faeb7e64e7cb27f53f0c606819c873c5711c0fc39e0405b8a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- cQ/oP1xoeYQOKRLHU2yLqmBzfuhSthakNIuWswxGvG7zvyBe/p3Yhyr3DzJf+nrEtR2M3S538jeI1R1jOsp3Bw==