why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBLCGWANROMCKXTCHWURJJM2FWSXIYF2EUVHGIATILIYIIQPUK7JOPUX, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 3bff40ffb7e19296709e4b01165de090612f38878104b1c4cbfa4c667c576686
- request
- b4da00a8907393061a0b87744de5cbb222c694bdd021329e1766df6aa94cec66
- transaction
- 2614e136b00920e7b37c73ab883ae8847fe1955ff7f49060fe937a8e4d0c2c04computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50115
the chainentry 50115
- sealed to the entry before
- d88f5e30a95931abfbb7455cc8d475b32fc05445d1f00ab6b1d6d9346385fa79
- this leaf
- 1cddcf1e6be3aa6ea6f913139dfaaf262b3a1f50c0375fcdd1f3af7c32298be1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- zYHDkfxzZ3whuqfLGPHmzL0tznqrr9HhNmN2EVJEnAVavTBaDqSDS3bCoaMM8MGwiKzPkdKKJR/PLuwnzNHBDg==