why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDPQ5KETMKN353UMR4SYSN4DVGLKIBAHTTUUUTF3UOKNZ2YDVJH4GUBI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7f78acafeb69a14870990dec2b0d459deda0cf9d91b24bc2d49f858f88aac6f7
- request
- 0caf999e2f9b9ea80140fed7b6bd80689b2b4c3d5c5d7bf38fd376f7e4e7ed34
- transaction
- c67f866a8b58a1bd686aadcc935fbeb787a2e25fe859e120f5a84db6524418f5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 11780
the chainentry 11780
- sealed to the entry before
- ac86e65c9196351827c8da42fc7c62fd27b31f1bd99259c848267f23ab8f9317
- this leaf
- 1dbef6c55c8caadb9c2be02ab01d733975474e745708a968d7d8b81ac250939b
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- L49xhS2ZeQvY+qfiRntFiBiw7VoFA3mqZO/aYTDp31o5vlbyq1IL3BCvT3fP162q0Dm2RELzv0Z+8XoUJattAA==