why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GCYU5NBBN47RJE6IVACWM4X7DUO2XAWSLTHFQURCYDEOJW7OFZG5S4TF, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCGLWTCG7RZQU625RW5ELXCVDATHQRCC5DB4AUFB3B2GA25BONJOZZV3, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCGLWTCG7RZQU625RW5ELXCVDATHQRCC5DB4AUFB3B2GA25BONJOZZV3 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7a23645fe7ea5ac7b8a3fd877d5a3fd485b0121755bdd5ebf306a2eeff97d9dc
- request
- 3c78a6db7bb68bcfc817d57c005542dbd7fcc15f3277d6ba4a74e35c8a5d6f8d
- transaction
- 5db81e6be7c6df66e71c4852eab30911a0936282d2aedb282f32c4155c3b1bd6computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56256
the chainentry 56256
- sealed to the entry before
- 150ccdf40e3c6f0cfb9957b8fbcdbc90eaada17d70e9f8767796c0c364fbf932
- this leaf
- 1dcc4bed34c506ee0872980fdb698089e0a801017dfb60d07701928720670fc8
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +5uM4c+8gtGr6scUVHSnsLWdtlkHVkw+UI9eq+Q5P9pwhb6lybftUQVa41aS9iehdF9BwC2Y1IFcC1s2zGhFCg==