why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBDZ25P2Y6KF3KMFSQFBQFCHJXMGUVCVU5JFUCHGEKI24NSHXYP743CO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- df5e2e3a71a2eb12ffe0b3bcf42ce37423ccfdd9c133cf4818456542d5960113
- request
- 22f7d9e6acf85ca90832e8914564e2c21f015ed70993ae6f9e40549a7c46279d
- transaction
- a066c257a4da6a3753cb0e552ffa3c34caca0bf24c78cd7aea9a0244bb90a24dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10517
the chainentry 10517
- sealed to the entry before
- 9d3e38c2824024e77a1185edb85db2ba8d3f4d7e42ac069dd58952e9bb9ed5df
- this leaf
- 1e902e5826188394b7caab3e83a57be66cebecf42c00c0127d2628e04905bff5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- LZNpmn3w6sBzH34YcEt5BjICiHO2RMcywK4T33GtdFpfaD8CQOL8+O61m9Pk0XU+Zb5Z9PcR5UNTHGaKuicoDw==