why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC46WIOO57XKKXHGRBWO4Q3QKZKCF6H773C7BIRCQ6I6RGOKQJAFLNTB, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC46WIOO57XKKXHGRBWO4Q3QKZKCF6H773C7BIRCQ6I6RGOKQJAFLNTB is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 07149ba5d3fce9d5d6eae13dfd453b58b0b9799b83a542b1ba5830f2d36e2825
- request
- c5b318e2b7c04b18d3e3b87cbf5f74ede5d6c17017344c3a2a7e72c7529c042c
- transaction
- 08004cca83399ad68834d010f7a224e6913ef14bf8a85b06eee4c2c0da07cf05computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50537
the chainentry 50537
- sealed to the entry before
- c5bf79224d22d64e1cc4d3a686be75d9728ac879f78c5cb8438645b9a55043fd
- this leaf
- 1f087338cfd4bf588e44a26c5652dec0598da542419304f96da9fcfe9d090f48
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- YF97aud9cdKd7o5r9Bk3CphP4QjpFo0FETBNNgvtczUoo0Ektfo7WL+O7CmHDawNaTK5dXmCMipYLvNTXOrHAw==