why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCZ5HAASI7OPFESR343Q6AHF3Q2RPBMC4TXKQ7ELR6FSV2BIWZZ3KDYW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c305d762295fd1a7ffbbdcddf287ab18ad1ee060ee998a6682b024708fae38fb
- request
- 1e9c5d8884fdedbbe2aee85494c484b35419cb3e4d18cf4041097f7af86d5257
- transaction
- 3a95c0e6e617513f46516ce24d25527d4a4bf59dbae6be2b7e36a27c539ce592computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56938
the chainentry 56938
- sealed to the entry before
- 2de3cf8f9fa4bd8ec258401024598658bd7c61a0a871cd8b1211ccc2aed26b6a
- this leaf
- 1fb52052edf6fe9b21fb2a14c79525d8a62dc4da94f223827048928166e06999
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- tt/NUJKq3pUsdT8WkgmUhNR2UdOA4AdLNibv82fJf9xCa4I3lhWx+hrLB1lhkIddVGuwJVux1gB605An1ztbBw==