why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCFERQUOVEWUIYFST4KDWZ7ARS42LYIU43G3E2C7CB6TBRZGIM6UR4HD, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCFERQUOVEWUIYFST4KDWZ7ARS42LYIU43G3E2C7CB6TBRZGIM6UR4HD is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- af980b59dc75a3c89c9dcee8ab48f4f2418e615e783d97e050d31ed4c7b685c9
- request
- 76ded4befd0ab200a7d89d46e4eff4e9f7213fd6859e4f516d180416ed16242c
- transaction
- 7e571dd6f3576701b1dc2b7b2badc3820cc12882c976daa1ed1f25ca2f1aa3a1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 92
the chainentry 92
- sealed to the entry before
- 91380a2f9cd4886345ddb2130958e857d0a1db974d515451f219672a78582a4b
- this leaf
- 20325686b4878a1bba4fe0daf364c23414e02f893374df25461071bd4c6e7f8a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- HZeUHBfQgy41CcC2nJdsEcDclol0OW3MbnCmziC3AsfXGEwKkpq04EGBaslqUVBeoAAHoIKoWapleDUb5dw1CA==