why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCJE6CNUG4RVLV7MF44E3EWYIEAZ5Y436LXLL6ZUBNINOTJGVHCXQ7Z5, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCJE6CNUG4RVLV7MF44E3EWYIEAZ5Y436LXLL6ZUBNINOTJGVHCXQ7Z5 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6b9f9c461a7f45f3dd85510d0a645fe3f25cd24d9433648273bef3c3c762a5cf
- request
- e1aa2a3daef12c5888636fc4c8c8bd8881636fd28891e824a2ba171796926d39
- transaction
- beb47badc8afa05ee75a1a1b36886962529e73667d86102b734581b344773098computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 70139
the chainentry 70139
- sealed to the entry before
- b1362c180c4ad6f4a418b10b4fc767fbd9a54d522619230c4c2c943b1e199f35
- this leaf
- 20938993e9a0d1b96440673fdc6d4d6702c478c567237d21bfb20c06ce0a7404
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Zd0qsxlpRDj9SZjO8ZpAyePKjKVsD50Z7bzA7d1oZko7+xiYcDP/L8AttwiJwxisRGdlbd+fpDJp058hDK+vDQ==