why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCYO5EBU2VZNRRLVZHWIT2MR32OMGHJHD25J2IP7OZRHWOJZY5GTY6DQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 25df99dd48c3436484e27427135acc5f7a1d2d6c0abd59c4513e17f9c59132b4
- request
- e18d27f1e5a99ed24ea75674df5f13cc4c43c1c3832390268d1db5e438709f3f
- transaction
- 0ab9540f6f38b96ac13cd45083ec2a93717ef5e940f8d18c1f4294c2996f8ec1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15207
the chainentry 15207
- sealed to the entry before
- 7cb201f1266444b2aa3edb28f784e1324d61173e5e100bce4337b9dac6693b14
- this leaf
- 20d86478d33cd8e3b81dc3a4076d77e7b22c813df93bf80810b92bb8efed51d1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- YumzeABll3l5ywOJsht1YdrrAHedAUwZfGyc311aQFx8n1N7tshDX+IQBZjatQaUJMEY1v8oCh3GiUyTlhOODQ==