why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDYG46PIV5SIXD47YBGFRG3PNQQWX7ZGBIT5XKZUC2F5RWIGVWFSVLXE, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 0c1fdbc06ef6e7c8301f201d0da256d1779d36a246313f336081efd5d773c57e
- request
- c822f11aa422cb502b5658a758dea6c24b156eea74182ac2d77bf739137eb864
- transaction
- 9516f087f273fa937e96a09c40d147ab88bd27d49ae168921179fb8822f1c1b6computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50362
the chainentry 50362
- sealed to the entry before
- 02d719f29922ea05ea1922c7fa24267fe5463d0af6c7fb9ebbc9c783f99303cb
- this leaf
- 21676d5caa8e3ae14ec640ef73ebcc404a9286a81c5dd13d041dd8518e46f2d1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Qaok91AO4KBKbVTkQvMxFHG4Z8a+2Yy7CdtSwaItSWCaqYoLwNCxzoaJN/wtA9RMT2LRM1DCAqKzs58NZhacCg==