why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GB7ZWJFOJEDGWTC76D3P7FS3E3LJEJKSPGSK47EH7NZ6UUWJWIWI3M7V to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- aecd07ae5c336474c2e2364ce7d946dc68eda7e700ca0a9cf3bb6c5b63559a45
- request
- d4ef506b6c123536a5ab2ac9e0907251f35326d80d810287f4b55d615a7a8bd1
- transaction
- e26c020c3a945dfea5428d0cee933217c38f2ebbfb0788a2be8f247a3342a89fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 9710
the chainentry 9710
- sealed to the entry before
- b976baa6fcd3c6449b189661c109832352c35863e82ebcfd7d235e7bf3d1f333
- this leaf
- 21c3b6021011867d798f42afc2be106b5733c4713e59b1dc645f0c9442a90334
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- BAM2Hf936IMnUIRqbYWT6QIeTVDdTIvEX/gPb+xMxFMutiEUW8eVQ0LEu0cRYdUC0xOTAsgQZtr4mkZDAy8wBA==