why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCOUHDWKLFQRLUWDMEA2X3WW5WP3BA4OQSDQQGGL7TNH6JYYCMFF2TNU to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 009934ec7cc9dea4f9266cf6c4785d8aa7e659ba23aaa1cad31cbc78d22439d2
- request
- bc495e3d3c84b738b818198449a001cbbd85486785eaca0f3b54414ecdc6adb1
- transaction
- a30afb364e7240665d1eeda33eeea3a5588e057b04e927b548f3545999c4caf2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 68671
the chainentry 68671
- sealed to the entry before
- d3f41ef07bc4cdff241d46c571872d486899a2be17f79cbcc84fdd9836209896
- this leaf
- 21ee2c057d52a35878ea42d68f971054a2b139c056e9ffa57278b8d934b6ce63
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 0L2p3Vb+ntXspTLJzctKMLf0k+oF9PEJH6eq9d5lAik062ydA3zjK78RVpHrSpb7sKSlPkgU25z1RKsJ6lgIAg==