why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB63JQOSABWEC6XKXKJMGEHXPXRYQHCI44QUECFZQ3KGBS4ONYZ6WNTJ, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 60ca94ec4891b2781d7a6aafbccec46d405f69912024cfdb597e307b257fa187
- request
- ab2d650bd4e8798fec8186a62ad92c68a653c3c76bc5f6578daf353bdd38fee8
- transaction
- c44ef4cc7557e8830b4100700003d95e52cf78392f20a2cc787eb54b49b84474computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50281
the chainentry 50281
- sealed to the entry before
- 81ddd84027bb4464c59b275b94ebe2fbb6cb2e701dd25a770c286b2466d2d7aa
- this leaf
- 229adc0b4905358d8ee56ef9377f4a9158060500ba28ddbdc7ba0ead799b744e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Bs5WMFVeNtxyzt6Q8IACCODPVSwCFBuKV+mvbb8RfQhJPFR1Vs/VNkgxWKzpqK51eGVhNerJ4afkHXEMEE47Dw==