why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDVIFJDJ3T3PULAYV3HWTAFKDK72ASGXNTIMRWFTCRQV765HE34CPMNF, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDVIFJDJ3T3PULAYV3HWTAFKDK72ASGXNTIMRWFTCRQV765HE34CPMNF is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9105f21aee7a66a20b729e5f09bff7726e011f8fef8fb7841c8d315c0acac5b5
- request
- 92994d21d113ea46489f4d96b5a6cddd29030a788dc9d027f880a4ac7bf5ddae
- transaction
- c049d3913e5d144583f5782b291864e4ddff8f794c02aa18bf7ad9f1ea33dcb5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 974
the chainentry 974
- sealed to the entry before
- 2f77c16f0f02a3dcf3295207985b471578dd6564fa2a566be9c2d99cc75a4626
- this leaf
- 2352c27ff7fbbf7dc5c7a0ad8d244c0e65086e55355ca175555fdc7765cb541a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- gKeJJCE08Z0KNNn1oOD/OC2F4LOgxFFUE6fJW3HOtkMUqgvvxn4EyLX43a+zN6HtyDbQ6UsvmlLRYlZIwo21AQ==