livelog 58,033 entries · root 2e85ea700dbb · read 01:40:35
the record/entry 57908
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDVPIUMT4J3CMAZ2GPAGTOSWOBYU5Y767RRA3P4SYGCMDFFZE5VETWTN to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.078ms2026-09-21 23:20:09
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDVPIUMT4J3CMAZ2GPAGTOSWOBYU5Y767RRA3P4SYGCMDFFZE5VETWTN to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
3ea632a7c353ddbfb8667f104a7c00023f4c64925931748b0eedcd244566f288
request
85669b774c4d99ea0dfabc24c939aa45ca97fc2bc893c4f0f9d71b63df5d453e
transaction
cb17ebed7e234dcdbcab196d33495c8f069556f66883d7829712b253a1450eca
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57908
recomputing…
the chainentry 57908
sealed to the entry before
db0761d3f12a2d7b19a83475d087675e841c16798ba46f5cd4f16be31f560a2c
this leaf
24ca96886a7e4bfbde0c868d434d94575126eb8e05901a3d633e1b27426b5d11
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
zOTcBUvvO2aTSP5hGvM/huXuj0ZnbML2bfEUFA2udVUvmGNHztO358+Gnb+KHvXh9PBnE2/Di3lGgQAua+58Ag==