why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCUDKI4RMYCTOMP5ETZ5KZKWV5B6BXFPN4ZNMXRMDWM2MAMJ3EANOEVL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bdcd5c4396ba0395facf1f0ecd319f928732a4bff9fa08bbbd69e35961713aec
- request
- a1375120e8922c3b61cbd9f472289dbb00755ab3c27a3aac91e91c2bb4f645ed
- transaction
- 4d8aec2ef342a52be17b794ca78e69b318ea468ea56fd4a6fa614b666dd23c7dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 24475
the chainentry 24475
- sealed to the entry before
- 056492e4b3d93ada2e17bd8a535be8503c8b0b474bc234ba8944ab0c1ed8cb21
- this leaf
- 250324b439cfe9862cf4f4817be332ce853685d66c5ddeba1677dceb19df361e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Gojd0DJtljrDXC5uxEPHU60goV65Bvz9op65H+wk9RbWGG4AIWR1CFgo7vyBm+kDvk1pqSILf5aYlC3YF1ogCQ==