why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB4LWDN6OX7WQWRDVJR44XEFRMHWB24XHHSXTZSMJA7NSS7I4AUS7JB3, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB4LWDN6OX7WQWRDVJR44XEFRMHWB24XHHSXTZSMJA7NSS7I4AUS7JB3 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7dd7c1b9e1b406aac1d27d09e8b37efd1cfb796a3c1c9b42ad234c4950c05604
- request
- 5f89439dcd094646c78dfaee7387600c0a2ccf4f0417d966e8b6c7fcae373965
- transaction
- fd8c2c03566d78fc9fdae647eb76ac308f66abe3c12e387757ddeb7c67586264computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 23195
the chainentry 23195
- sealed to the entry before
- d646c6cfafece66d53ec7939d90747538dee5fac13a62916fa558be746b7fd92
- this leaf
- 25f85219b339f814f1907c145c246ccd0b67c2bf6930d3ec51274d974add29f2
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- qGGnFTc9WK3G/bWPvKpGFBk/fp3XdnKN5yJQT51YGYIzTAej3hQsRlwAbNnXx1HBZi9XW9F7/IwqrfwLs3DACg==