why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBCH6X4DAHEHAGB6UXUJKQHMDCYUXHI3SGACIVRODDJBJT6D5C2KTXRS to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 78dc68496316bb6ddd0c5f98b2507c6ca62535150f75d70cf127a0ef43a0bf9d
- request
- f66d5ad2d03794e372edcb0d4ef9faa007c7f6f29f6f3a13a0a6d3b62b3a3187
- transaction
- f98bdd7f4b6c7821527a55a8a0146568eb58e04c93106bbf823b3ce8047cf91dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56808
the chainentry 56808
- sealed to the entry before
- 43080324933e0d5626b361742906c0c9f757c1095b1ff0ce5b2cd61dfdaca943
- this leaf
- 27c79a6385dcea2498eb856eb5c24b7957c6659c858226682cc2e1f84ce4f534
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- X+cFZa6VCSil/X1fW6xU6SiliOb3KTAGhn0wgWnge6krpFzMbNAqTS61jVmPMOT6JRhXg+BIcMbEoTo2G/wAAw==