why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBJ7SV5H266BYNNC4LFPWQV5DLD7DOTMDDOKBLDZY2LY5IXYEIVMH375 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 0a2501801f753d307a1034bf0c029cf1f0417dff42f8a2d0778ec8bc44cc3b26
- request
- ce1c6b2fd6468d1f7089481ce1bd9b8531606a19e013b916c600ae69799ac43d
- transaction
- 51bad828e71f3e382e92fb59a6e6c44a46f75bf82d613afe143df08f2f704052computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 58296
the chainentry 58296
- sealed to the entry before
- 43daa07a2187ea53515a2cbca9f3557fd08bdadf7e4db99c5ffdd26e2c3c29ec
- this leaf
- 2872e3f4024c4bee2c06deafc4a1106076733a9fee6dfbaf4c7912836b4ef980
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ZSM4wrOgcESYh8Upek4bjHGM2Ff3SBTDjBIiOWAo43K4y/yi0N4HHPlbYwzro4rpxnCljzmcnYRHG32/U69tCg==