why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCXF5PKCZOJEAFPJOXA5KPNPVIRFR4AJVOMIW5GEQTLHN67AAKIV3VD3 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f9804ec08e3eb48d0b1a1fd7b569a2d78d3d98dbdd314c62f7bbdb0caab53203
- request
- fb5e70ff53bc0a698d6a7b668aea24ad506b1a34b6bbc376f22a695d1cfad873
- transaction
- 1bd1d87c53268fef4148f4c475e211576689157ebec0d48b58c26012063f3caecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76726
the chainentry 76726
- sealed to the entry before
- 5a90ae55f6edee7cf65d62257f644aa211409cb77ea6963a60f729de3406ea7f
- this leaf
- 292fd0c6244ed508e58965e33a91aa8596c2f7ba13e2c705b866d9b85be19009
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- FXwr2kGnmcAtWB0W7nIDi2G/lcXLOeZsFHKNR8NjBxfiDYcvRNOqRGMdeAj1817wvtGQ1gUwsnLFkl1Q6NE5Dg==