why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAXZOL5TIIQGTT3EK5Q3D4MUGQDLXUXDZLJHFPP2P2544ZHZY6PNWQ7D, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAXZOL5TIIQGTT3EK5Q3D4MUGQDLXUXDZLJHFPP2P2544ZHZY6PNWQ7D is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e8f11a6e182c08f8ca5430a8303d5d9a4dc28894ffc362f9f44ff649a7901491
- request
- fc7e6c04cf1869f74b9b5be0ae3086fe3604dbad9a110411b54980c672d564fd
- transaction
- cac2b0746fca29babf116a0e46aadbd25ae2b280d16d9f9fd0da19a77a855cb3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 60315
the chainentry 60315
- sealed to the entry before
- ecac954e8e7996309e8361b44870b59dc3a31a75f246707f215b729f0b87a0d4
- this leaf
- 29e2c8b615502164c0ae442f45cb7d6ec4c163240fb7348186d98e00892730a0
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- f4l49xFlI31J1GhVsttYqTtIQlJ+UVMVFjlo4y5W6lVtV6AWXBcEqdqcX5bovAoIWNLwTdbnHjfw3kt0lYV1Cw==