livelog 16,314 entries · root abd1b5c6599b · read 04:22:41
the record/entry 15374
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBXVBZCDBF7KUGEKVOZQJX6KXLF2UBJA776QD7SQA7DRXE5IOJVW26DI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.485ms2026-08-20 11:12:25
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBXVBZCDBF7KUGEKVOZQJX6KXLF2UBJA776QD7SQA7DRXE5IOJVW26DI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
d3a65a480d3d60c454c223c07d86a2144e42e9f97a46fafd5ada30d07167352a
request
33e4ec3d3d31a2dc3619906125e035bcb6879631d19f368fbc7a545cd3853262
transaction
2a8b1afedfcb5b3eaa4114955308f2a511b925e1112f2394620cee5aac0db142
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15374
recomputing…
the chainentry 15374
sealed to the entry before
af25690c1fa71b07700af6742955cbdec7b9a9ac700dca50ed40300364481784
this leaf
2a366f7d4ffabacae824e59720f76941b0992051a5b38904fa858497b127bc1a
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
d48DgZf9Af1aGATyzofcjpY7z8iU4ajGCkShyVNXYczLTuHTEj7uW2zJIF9VC0tpq2JERT4OH1+ATIVBdUqzAw==