livelog 48,663 entries · root abd4d8c13838 · read 03:45:32
the record/entry 48574
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDJO23YWJO3754THXPSAXDXJWFNRSTXRH36LZNMHFQMTFGVKXUJLSFMG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.898ms2026-09-15 02:05:09
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDJO23YWJO3754THXPSAXDXJWFNRSTXRH36LZNMHFQMTFGVKXUJLSFMG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
7abf5ff4998b805dcd383ded3b87ca16497d54b8376c150997e830b662e575af
request
eee0c904506c6edfb7729326058ad6b24a553f03c5f1f73b9237267c6cd89176
transaction
96ff3f71708eb558e615ed501daa01658ee4645daac5bb9d11bd531244497635
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 48574
recomputing…
the chainentry 48574
sealed to the entry before
8c41d48dcd80f94e18b2914b6b566bea780cae35503344313b1055c662cf0cc1
this leaf
2b4bb3773c6ab6d2e6b193fa6cbd5645873be603c826b4e020d0e6df400495d0
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
eIkyNQXIG4QuAwcyXHnBBSqn08ovugSx9F79YIOrRnglCwnQyl5T8h+5U2JZYaoPnPs17zANlmUQw4Iyp3dMCg==