why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBXUJ74D77S56N5URV4Z4KWMRND4KMSW7PTQZ4DHBO7I3TYBSMBDDV5U, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBXUJ74D77S56N5URV4Z4KWMRND4KMSW7PTQZ4DHBO7I3TYBSMBDDV5U is on the screening list: counterparty 0x9f3a7c2e1d4b5a6f8e9d0c1b2a3f4e5d6c7b8a90 is flagged by demo cluster. demo drainer cluster used by the tour. not a report from any feed.
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- cc1401357355ebf2446873dd5c556bd0fdfcab8ec45c2d53834cf8aa13d0f0f8
- request
- 6d369a40364a1effb86f2f90b161c0802aad0caca80ed34e6b814b3b5b2b6eba
- transaction
- ff6d673f4b6ba6cd8ab491973e4f3597b0fce2b582406af3b17b61d1d70d933ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50462
the chainentry 50462
- sealed to the entry before
- c77cac5894333a3ccfc175e4fe00f697907a1679487781be61192a9e340c452f
- this leaf
- 2cece342aadefef7438ae1380169b5368094e223ee4e1a0cab82811ba39ded75
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 0AOnnRgWZWuGWyoxaOg1SXF4+Lt5wiDGer8kLaXcDBnWMtPR5Qo+hdFSgH64L8aD5Jlfg6SbHdwoEdK1bBF9DA==