why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB4A6C3T3D4VFSI4JXUOYIXMOT4KTBAZN77WIHMUOLFISW2SUO2TAKIZ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB4A6C3T3D4VFSI4JXUOYIXMOT4KTBAZN77WIHMUOLFISW2SUO2TAKIZ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b04fe7240e96d59a670173288f1c395332d1d20a55b6f42310534ab9cf3ba4f9
- request
- 8d953e7d0a5b3f9d0d50881bd2f8eac45d6db15c890837eb3e24d333ec44ad1e
- transaction
- 85c0737183e0fd5bc58f4a6b18c948e292182d2e4cd46b6b0aa0911a05791be2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 959
the chainentry 959
- sealed to the entry before
- 516f1ce0297d9d83786e7fa551895d816af92c47d64a8da5533a70b69a12247d
- this leaf
- 2d7961ad76c752d9eaa9ae5dc490cd8c77267ab386f7a7b715d4d4c750e2f83e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- G6YeZDlf5SXwIzgUcH4zQ9V2Tp94bln0gXuqb1NVWy6KgeFfENA5Q+vy/P2hMb7EQsQbsGQd9n1Gfu4JGewPBg==