why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCJEXH4ETKXOHHPQL67BRZGX47AE537MWD7XNOU3SX7YVK6J224AJTNN, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCJEXH4ETKXOHHPQL67BRZGX47AE537MWD7XNOU3SX7YVK6J224AJTNN is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a91a25f8a939b8a52af123fed6081a4b464f55e3c4f91eec2aa3144712905833
- request
- 5d0b8901e9fbd52f3703bbd521f2cc5b7b92204397e4fa1199a77ee32a330dc1
- transaction
- f1a0f704a6c38b99d513d1d35a1a53de44e06332d8abcc1378ef53e0d8704fdacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 66923
the chainentry 66923
- sealed to the entry before
- ef9c13dd2e234fb240d3f2f49c6d4caa626cce52f882e5b1bfabff345856a7b2
- this leaf
- 2db1ad21f2981a61eff906253180ea7070a375336583bb48ae77af972208ab14
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- kGFu4yhCysOvz30nNcHpLdcprrdTLcWIBeB8zYfsv2s6P++VpQ+xTqR2S3DZybaG0io2n3BCOTcyd83/4nw2DA==