why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAC3FVRS6FXRYEIWAQFCKUDANTGVQCULOFTO26UK4L4PXP3PFT44YB74 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b16d862ac86e83a1d1b03f4c647d78fc835a42b0729e2852d3e36131446c8ca2
- request
- c6245463738e39dbb02cb925bb98b385fd03f083fdfa5c2d9620d2d1dd0c390a
- transaction
- 4dd021df8e7022f1c0815291aed996b7320957ee45a21a4cc656fdb323fda44dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 26089
the chainentry 26089
- sealed to the entry before
- aef3f194c3dd284c13fdbb73ffd20b9fd43f1e218d2c3409eab1391dd652f63e
- this leaf
- 2e2f925f74cd22769c56d9818db4cdb9b68e0e439637372650767abd79603a5d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- UZ8rK+Hq3LBvnfB6v/5vMd2xu4Fcr6uC2knjBPriNlAoosHwpkvnxGe4CDQFOlAqjoEskIj3UuordloZLGwqAw==