why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAQJLBAAOZNOT3GN5MX7UJ5QMO5BR5NYP5SGEOFYRXANI6KOKNCFKCFR to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 5e543d778b12e9969bd6b080a6413ace5df71359e3df10db54836eb5e2766213
- request
- 5fc69ef3206c0e34cb94c4ceb783a7423d7a3ff438626b285f7d58e6219a9baf
- transaction
- 547efe1be5fdded7b71e486d231bbc8ff0ed516fae8baf7e614d193c13c43471computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 26959
the chainentry 26959
- sealed to the entry before
- d63013b51fba80e38c648437e025ffae3fea7d1f886d19266f68a075b832b7cd
- this leaf
- 2ff164ab764410ec5d0a2b40599d4354723a44856931aa3e612d9fc5038654b7
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- k5XoM9c/3xuqqsNUor0rUA2cvbZwA6CgAMD8ZRUhkVA+//+SYQ0FHh5PcDCqYX771UNVegmRFIoyxwkmYtxaCQ==