why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCKFPJNCQ7VZANVM44LF6AAP4XJSNEP7OSTMX6KLQXJ4M5ZA3MJ25OLV to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- dba74f300f40c84533e9378772936f7847129921c4c08fbe44b102ecfcc1fd3f
- request
- 2e522964f10b493d2f43ac678a0812627a49aa009c11fd05f5c6c08c7db24286
- transaction
- 22a5144b58adddcdf18908c0067e3d7cf8b05fc7cc7a0e77b23014e6a94dc470computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 31706
the chainentry 31706
- sealed to the entry before
- 9e97e04b9d31438e0224e48bcf6eeb59a817e49ed198759b0046f07c5efb5bfd
- this leaf
- 318594c96ecaccae4a6a481e8b529d8fa438c4e48ff91cac02ee3c83cc8cffa1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- wDE5CennTh0XU7GANlD165yI8OjDXjW3Irx4aeh3oTW72M6ygpSd+4d01MadYpgULdsgig/ycWInT/Bn+GG1CQ==