why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GBC4SYXYJTEMJGLLPQ4X3TRPWRZUM2BLD2TMQCFURIPZ24ESCQFZRKMZ, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAZEHX4RN4JDNRZPZ2XX7NJ3JF33M3BEVVG4QJWX5BKN2U4DDOHR2MN4, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAZEHX4RN4JDNRZPZ2XX7NJ3JF33M3BEVVG4QJWX5BKN2U4DDOHR2MN4 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a353da44e016f9bb233fb9f1bd583764d63d83610d552b3eb216fedb8b983ce1
- request
- 4ced0133d593fabd1033455fe1d4d1e29c1b403a709fdc45eca3548560d7ed0c
- transaction
- a050a6ddb22b73498248f97773bf64fb3cf8bce08bd8c0d1c294072949756084computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 39535
the chainentry 39535
- sealed to the entry before
- fc753d1e163b7afff5a3d625a5a5542c9bc0d11b306039ef07cb99df88c77e02
- this leaf
- 324ed5bdf0902b015961a96106cc8af1c94b41bdbfedefba87010fb7444ae5e5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- EsaMwfmPCcAvlz9vvPWEnp4UCl+60WHTykzcKrnyJ1e20zc2k6mfFTIW2tvkzPC/XKb6GAkt1tnDQxt2zibgCg==