why1 reason
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 900.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f931d807c90bf7a134d893e8d5e44b596890ade10903f5fe8a6dbc102c9c800f
- request
- be769eb83a390e66fc2f09876b2f9a1ee477f3fa62e12870082bec36417e49cc
- transaction
- f5ce0bdc04782daf489529948170a455f883902e40ced1c664ef988cc26a8b1acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57259
the chainentry 57259
- sealed to the entry before
- 8225a165f2aee07900e17eadd3149f0b8edffb746fe13e3ae70909f65f750751
- this leaf
- 332aa78f58069675a3a50b2548459740191a3fa8e98ca24e1fcfab4f78112c11
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 9pad2FZxgi53juabzeoF4kVEfWYXrWHTDZW4etezmdtDX9uUFjGPSvIV1MvFuPRdzfyPnbmeenBVBfmLi4tvAw==