livelog 16,563 entries · root a61082143744 · read 08:57:41
the record/entry 15722
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDDOEOHLK6ZPBZNXP5DJ6NWT5ZLYLZBFMUMSDDQ7TH5KOVKVY4TG7QUF to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.110ms2026-08-20 17:42:30
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDDOEOHLK6ZPBZNXP5DJ6NWT5ZLYLZBFMUMSDDQ7TH5KOVKVY4TG7QUF to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
c3f1913d433766c29b3605c45636f38f5e53c72746c336f8f22c98e6c73d013d
request
35b133c1f975a10c9627c830a9d8e4750a53d92ca25b7ce9c3ec550098fa4a04
transaction
6b1acc71995788ff779386e620ba119b3059b7a547a1508ee889207aa1dbfa7c
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15722
recomputing…
the chainentry 15722
sealed to the entry before
ba32349c2d62a12239310efdfe8233b7665702e1868c98268e85c332dbdc0528
this leaf
341e6322e17b7295cfdbe6d6cafc14a4d3adef895f082d60f7c19865921ed049
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
EIzPjnaeEAuIxS7bpvKzetX1tS+VFA41mHHY5zIsgk9idx4+AJQdiFYqennPBl1LLQ/6XqmXWbInXWSz5wUUAQ==