livelog 31,246 entries · root 085fecb1bef3 · read 17:43:09
the record/entry 30299
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCK57HQTWBOUYG2QNNDNFGFSKS7JXBZTNYRYYEXPT6XWQWPAMYDC3DEB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.951ms2026-09-01 00:17:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCK57HQTWBOUYG2QNNDNFGFSKS7JXBZTNYRYYEXPT6XWQWPAMYDC3DEB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
ad314dda410b8ce4834a71b586ebf78e113f6ce88853b2309985151e7f7f924e
request
038559bc3f057e79f924893ec982a03f6b59bb69b8c75084e61196b35fb787c2
transaction
77312fb1d02944875e833e48566276704e913c15cbb9dcd6af53346a7537e5cc
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30299
recomputing…
the chainentry 30299
sealed to the entry before
d3715bb629370979a617045b69bcb5a06b5dbafe3f8bbab698191a9c3dcf3bbd
this leaf
350395f21597f90f9188ffcd190afb60cf251b3f2d9a7de3a30196eabac43d25
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
9RtantxmJhJVkPALmekFvQP3EY3PWXpl2i+2yejEirnWD7UpZ3wvdsvn/k9vbl7jORxyF+JCFyS63ltwEvhYAQ==