why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC3RCLVNMQKVJ4IYJDIYHT7HVBTH5C3CMNEQUJHGZ254HW6J2LUFHPW7, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC3RCLVNMQKVJ4IYJDIYHT7HVBTH5C3CMNEQUJHGZ254HW6J2LUFHPW7 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8441a8b1f51df045327b81299489d5e9da41d07a8010e076268346b12ceeb94b
- request
- 560cd667cb1d429f0cab3d1e504526443a43b3df24b578b7616fa7e644626df3
- transaction
- 1c291f9435ec02d97919aafb09ba8d5e848f99925425ada9f0b0e0a224beed44computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 19592
the chainentry 19592
- sealed to the entry before
- d10a619675e55fc3c6fa3aea6fbabc1ee815894c8936326911bb6649028f9b9a
- this leaf
- 35e00d3306bf511428ffe318e8f9da9b3092f7a59606f645f81aa136aad5d1c1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- nDdx+a6oAFz3ODSJiBKbktiHib0aOEOxDWpSARqlnqcqwTAkl7zOpgFe+kAMg49rB6I8bAq7NRbN35Z1doPSBw==