livelog 58,943 entries · root 7ff7a505762c · read 18:35:31
the record/entry 58835
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GC6LUBTEGLGWRIZH7IBT3MDIFBKBWCXPTAZJT2M5Z3MEI5YO7JDMGZIF to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.251ms2026-09-22 16:30:08
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GC6LUBTEGLGWRIZH7IBT3MDIFBKBWCXPTAZJT2M5Z3MEI5YO7JDMGZIF to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
867ed7b8e81ef9a8bd59b69c2ab4b9d5434fedb6ce16367bad036b50532b2faa
request
109e4c009f43d669ce94310bdcd9c13fa0e950a535dcb999c0462f2003ecbac3
transaction
18b807dd8bdae1a364fb5c84ee9f899773054ad7d611d9ed631c1dfe4fc83b56
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 58835
recomputing…
the chainentry 58835
sealed to the entry before
dc096c322cd24f50901eec2f9bd2337ee3e505472ebdde97fd8df90b893782d7
this leaf
374d63d1a50c66a53999750998f48acfd5bdfdd9ca960ce320c1c8985695ce45
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
ABIKePg+vPfALcoJY1L7pHuSunGsXXCU960ha8S8823P0naOtkX15nODvol7zH3RlMj/swa2iH+hrHAydUt0Dw==