why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCVJXY3PWQ64ZA6JF3HWP5UBCNBFBIIPMPHXRM6V2QYJM646PAZKY6UQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 3d096b947b5f4a8e4c81e7dd0279000c0ba048aa7d37a7d8c343b5779aa9ab3c
- request
- 45ded97418d50614a9df0fbffcf8a109468d80cadb8fd761c96d01885005d8e3
- transaction
- 0befa5c073066da7f43852e39fab401ac96993ace5d1878013e3544850e0a365computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 47074
the chainentry 47074
- sealed to the entry before
- 2ae5d209801d661d94c8c7643938f4c0bff9f7e8615f9e996c279224f8853d92
- this leaf
- 3840681ade32d09cae3d2b08d33e2bd3f5b25574228da74ac5beff75e7698bb5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 2pTI+XiTOwnwPNQ2ld89r+bsCWoJENvNW3ZZV1AEIG6SUp3TDTaawDbm94k7YrwbB9nSlfkXpEESbgFYnlxRCQ==