why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAXINM4OFAP6I44E2RTRJVVC3KEFPW2MLK52QO2YD6QOSXFP7JJFNZZC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a2e9d7e09e3f132f110e83a4e9514e8db0912d21a0e9ed5e275043892703565c
- request
- ce1311c66687a38f158ce15498042a37144b6ee61cb1cdccbdc3ca2fc58e8adc
- transaction
- a8f4d4aef0726f6b125256bddb10bf5d8ddf755cf42e7100156ee1b29623d8c8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 34996
the chainentry 34996
- sealed to the entry before
- 098c9478ec70affe75b39c26e615e6d3d752f306eaa9eeedaa42879364c4d48b
- this leaf
- 3b3dd7c613672678e162bf6ae5f861399d924d894e482aaa4fcd6db7fa128559
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 0wcIzV4CKrd0l6kgkVloLeMurzsiUPeIIzi8EfIWk80CDPzkO2h1GgzTYui4SdP6wVRuAxCOIIfW57TqGF6hCw==