why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GABIP2CGTI3XZM63QJW4SFO26TMV6SOBYLCHSOTWZNVSMDOYYKRKY56A, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 86ae638737021e3ec9c7b47ff57ed241b17dc15bc7cf626003bf79a28e89ae40
- request
- 04e850e1be6abd437d1d28d415095f4f1239701100f23a4c9c0e13d68b5ddbdf
- transaction
- 8ff9bd81807fbef815c5c420115fdb51f02df583e0a0656ece4b706f09f54b42computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57265
the chainentry 57265
- sealed to the entry before
- 54dd287df638108ee4134ccabd0e3ef970e55a4b12b709b73a21d36a66b479e1
- this leaf
- 3be3c011bd8e12fb21d66a4f7bbf34cbc9a35ef90d4e8939a7693e7eec237698
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 5fLyBu62JstEs/eizc+7q5oV/o2KjV8SCY9eqfOnvFFcmiZUvdWoYcbOME6ovzqgkook04ubSP2nbtwrq+t0Cg==