why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC4EWANW2YSNKVT4V4U3UNEFYS3FXBG5PYJBQJE5SNGRA65LHULOLDYL, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC4EWANW2YSNKVT4V4U3UNEFYS3FXBG5PYJBQJE5SNGRA65LHULOLDYL is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 861e65cc7484004ac2cdf84130ac66421079bc3a36942f0c12bd60bb69741a62
- request
- de5a8d996c27f3e1a3ce3af24d02149730d5655a95c16f6d01c2034b0f1a017b
- transaction
- c2f4914ecb10d68057359c7721746ffd08b351555aa3c19c1889e66e09f17328computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 742
the chainentry 742
- sealed to the entry before
- 8c382d4d6f607701c31bc32250c56694a9fe300a41bd79b173adda5252d46e33
- this leaf
- 3be75783b0f63dc76b39670961d560d6f40d9031971e528b750b9bd4e6ef6e11
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Dmkc438WUHxttGDf2q9A0mERmhFVC1JuqWorpiaohK3Ow67IVt0JyHb6qRQPolyV3n/EYQ2ex9YJOJlhX/wECQ==