why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCJJ2Q5UJHRU2UGD6DIKD5SMEESZJ6763Y4NLXOZVAQVQ4HWSU4BA6LO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- fd6bfb6055c619c9b03342218b19e6805f6da9954b14ac77f900b5a89526eea5
- request
- e0bdda17565d622b9a131c8fa8e1be130652678ef00b68ff74b19c9a418a8cde
- transaction
- b834d555f2f73077c92dfc9bbb50b9c8fb454484fa652d595c3b54438054d3dacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 64510
the chainentry 64510
- sealed to the entry before
- dc9f4ac8a42585e95e4257221e81f2a3a810ac1f6edcd3ffe6a49f37cb9219b5
- this leaf
- 3db37d48499619bec1f23c5444b5794cb0cc05ad8414d79bc54ff44782728dac
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- YpIBHQCt8Muu8yiaEPN7u1c9Rj3VAvMkJbi5y2L6ptwVFbIGRMKnih1gE8sZDnz2SCjUHAi4lkZqsiwF+BjDCg==