why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GANIMDUHIY3G6HFLJ5LA5I4L7DMWU74SJ3YYENXIYPQQVY37MIXVAXL6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d9ce0bedac264a052ffb4e98fdf6634cd27a9122519cc1fbc63b8ec557542a05
- request
- 6b272a68db8159c6f735e9dcf3eaece4cb2cec7525be18f051c610c04d8bd060
- transaction
- 9bd0f3cf6ad8a58cc4779ae47d926fd28ece3664cba9c35460019679c456cad9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 54488
the chainentry 54488
- sealed to the entry before
- 172b88ebd398efd062fbf1a302448e75f3e7949d4a5658531a2d0f9279e7d15f
- this leaf
- 3e9337b732591b6e93a7e6f63673d52b9bda22367fd2765a6006c245a98527f8
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- /0DZCLp0mELXutcO0NU4ve7heZ7PMGVV0+7FPmLkaXp0pKwX1ojCAWXEoIgMq4gmtqTct3Qr0T+vwGGlEaa7Cw==