why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCHV47MNGDFMA4S6RVMOOYTZ2QAPW2M3TMSBFE5OVLKET5AVBGTLZJJH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 4cd21063df9caaf1f869b85860d3c0ee163a4236ed0beb4bd0970f76b03b0039
- request
- 2738544fa1b4f8d1487b77293b6b8ed3f61fb732684603e72da58dc5682cde9f
- transaction
- 3175c6420076e586643318b8b8560ff55fbb1e74e91c0e99b7456a408f2f369acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 37034
the chainentry 37034
- sealed to the entry before
- 3d19add7014ab1e162a7fd1dfd2db29a2a03f161cd9c4d85501fa9490351c4db
- this leaf
- 3e95ab3ff2780ab0fc9ee0a0863d0a7c9ecf8e337efdd20ccc881fd2dc800f15
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- kjuyo8rGPCXFfMRZgshxoCsrUFRjEXbnRtLW9KYeXeSKNsez+d31Wb7ibFLngGTNg/CPHTDNl4L6TZKiIikQCw==