livelog 76,411 entries · root b9c0d4b07a3a… · read 06:25:44
the record/entry 76259
DENY
refused before it reached the network
op 0 pays GDDEQXVBJEYQP34FST2QMH7CES3STDRX2UHJFFOZKHGPSMM6VQBLCA2X, which is not in the allowlist
decided in 7.480ms2026-10-06 03:40:24
why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed

op 0 pays GDDEQXVBJEYQP34FST2QMH7CES3STDRX2UHJFFOZKHGPSMM6VQBLCA2X, which is not in the allowlist

counterpartycounterparty_denied

GDDEQXVBJEYQP34FST2QMH7CES3STDRX2UHJFFOZKHGPSMM6VQBLCA2X is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
5a135e4080ae1a4a2e6df36dc774f45f3c681a1942ec1f54d0c6f3b49af4b58a
request
eb54743961ac7d674f2e481c75e7c924d35295a3c5cbf8eec08da65f6d36f96b
transaction
ad373c3fffd0cce8432dce5f6ac0b22230d29cd94cc694abcfa84f40841159a4
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76259
recomputing…
the chainentry 76259
sealed to the entry before
5eaaf40dd4f2d9911bcbdc9fabd50f2afec59d00d7a21261ed1618fbabc56e75
this leaf
3ec30c0427cdb60bd0324ee181f42ecf0b6f99f1d7a8245d68b62f79efefc130
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
EEhARsueMZ+bI1FQukV+9FpWT0zWGTcxeUkK7xZ3Pqb3bGYJce6FKrIFsCOWl7H6eqqGhVgBEbFvPBbsCzcSCw==