why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAO7XK3DHCTPT32IWGROAI4ZW2Q7GF72CYI4MO44HJTWGONM3JEZIHU5 to 228 over the last 60000ms, above the 120 window cap, with 88 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 140.0000000, cap is 100
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9b7a33aed1d5cca46eca7027cb82f4bc91e2f5fa36905b1c28312cb09c7b16ce
- request
- cda3f8f817f076741dd554307eb7da7d934e78b978921b0a33d35c377e4250a5
- transaction
- f29a1a006cfbd06b7712ec491de2fff2138cad6bc7d30766d9f94a3beba69005computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 27
the chainentry 27
- sealed to the entry before
- 1e64583dfe97e91bbfca6cabf85c231cfe30dbe9f822ea2bcffa7de9cd9ee802
- this leaf
- 3ed7e0bceed0313521c9c7e4b1d8af7efb820e77f7d55727825e7e6e19e9314d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- gmmE+1OcCwp83F0O1YlNhGYnkvXvDkOz0vDLw3FmexIoDSUyFibtK4k+329QyJf25Ui9Kj3l8TGQlqveDl15Bg==