livelog 31,460 entries · root e7ff5cf7bd97 · read 21:38:21
the record/entry 30652
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDLVYU5T7DVR44VRCU275K6WEOIDKD7KPPUBYTVJNO4HZF3MHENUOFX5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.398ms2026-09-01 06:47:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDLVYU5T7DVR44VRCU275K6WEOIDKD7KPPUBYTVJNO4HZF3MHENUOFX5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
86b072832ed606e195b77f169bf3101294021d28d67ba58c489f8295909bf23c
request
1099fe038b88f2885ea28ac880a0f43ce365f1775cfc5c798b5082b06dd06dfd
transaction
77f45b451b46b490bde234791bb8a11e95f0e7d736b40062edd5b77dad3ce75a
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30652
recomputing…
the chainentry 30652
sealed to the entry before
bef501e358c6428449cdfb13969b3381bfdb25f4c848e7e9e49c1c9f98d387e4
this leaf
3ef9101105d29696d24231e76cf50a714b0247619cc266a2e5c7111f8f32d043
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
Em1eevNl12eVRptLGG7vu89gxRWzfi38+YqHNAqy65mnrqqG6P5OXzUa6t5KpU2U6VJDrc1ZDQC4ktKp4XBoCQ==